Indigenous Genocide Canada

Close to Home

When European colonizers arrived, North America held an estimated 5 million to 15 million Indigenous people.

By 1900, through warfare. introduction of disease, state-sponsored violence, assimilation policies, systematic destruction, forced displacement, massacres, and cultural erasure the Indigenous population fell to fewer than 300,000.


Throughout the history of Canada, the Canadian government, its colonial predecessors, and European settlers perpetrated systematic violence against Indigenous peoples that has been described as genocide.




The genocide and crimes against humanity included instances of forced displacement, land dispossession, medical segregation, nutrition experiments, physical violence, and compulsory cultural assimilation programs.

The Indian Act of 1876 is a Canadian federal law that combined earlier colonial rules to manage Indian status, reserve lands, and First Nations governments. It gave the government total control over First Nations people with the goal of forcing them to give up their culture and join Euro-Canadian society.

Though amended many times—such as in 1951 and 1985 to remove some unfair rules—the core framework of the Indian Act remains in force today.

Native American Genocide in Canada

Throughout the history of Canada, the Canadian government, its colonial predecessors, and European settlers perpetrated systematic violence against Indigenous peoples that in contemporary times, increasingly has been described as genocide, and cultural genocide.

The treatment has also been described as ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity. These collective actions included instances of forced displacement, land dispossession, medical segregation, nutrition experiments, physical violence, and compulsory cultural assimilation programs.

Canada engaged in a wide range of genocides. The governments funded and encouraged military campaigns against Native tribes.

1862 Smallpox Epidemic

The 1862 Pacific Northwest smallpox epidemic started in Victoria on Vancouver Island and spread among the indigenous peoples of the Pacific Northwest Coast. $20,000 British Columbia Indigenous died.

While colonial authorities used quarantine, smallpox vaccine, and inoculation to keep the disease from spreading among colonists and settlers, it was largely allowed to spread among indigenous peoples.

Some historians have described it as a deliberate genocide because the Colony of Vancouver Island and the Colony of British Columbia could have prevented the epidemic but chose not to, and in some ways facilitated it.

The colonial response to the epidemic among First Nations was a long-sought opportunity to be rid of them and an opportunity to take over First Nation lands.

Massacres

Federal troops and migrating settlers repeatedly targeted non-combatants, including women and children, in events like the Bloody Falls Massacre on July 17, 1771, the Hanging of Tsilhqot'in Chiefs on October 26, 1864, and the Cypress Hills Massacre on June 1, 1873.

Hanging of the Chilootin Chiefs - Quesnelle, BC, October 26, 1864

The Indian Residential School System

Beginning in 1874 and lasting until 1996, the Canadian government, in partnership with the dominant Christian Churches, ran 130 residential boarding schools across Canada.

St. Paul's Indian Industrial School - Middlechurch, Manitoba, 1901

While the schools provided some education, they were plagued by under-funding, disease, abuse, sexual abuse and death.

  • Forced Assimilation and Cultural Genocide:
    "Kill the Indian in the Child" is an infamous historical phrase that reflects the forcible separation of Indigenous children from their families and placing them in Indian Residential Schools stripping away their native languages, cultures, and traditions.

  • Abuse and Identity Stripping:
    In these military-style schools, children were severely punished for speaking their native languages, forced to cut their hair, and subjected to harsh labor and unsanitary conditions.

  • Unmarked Graves:
    Recent federal investigations have documented systemic abuse and thousands of child deaths at these institutions, with many buried in unmarked graves.

  • Nutrition Experiments:
    Run by the Canadian Department of Pensions and National Health (now Health Canada), nutritional experiments were conducted between 1942 and 1952 using Indigenous children from Residential Schools in Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, Nova Scotia, and Ontario.

    Under the guise of learning about the relative importance and optimum levels of newly discovered vitamins and nutritional supplements, the experiments included deliberate, sustained malnourishment.

  • Forced Sterilization:
    Another aspect of the residential school system was its use of forced sterilization on Indigenous women who chose not to follow the schools advice of marrying non-Indigenous men

  • Unmarked Graves:
    Recent federal investigations have documented systemic abuse and thousands of child deaths at these institutions, with many buried in unmarked graves. Ground-penetrating radar searches at former school sites have revealed thousands of suspected unmarked graves of children who never returned home.

Cross Lake Indian Residential School
Cross Lake, Manitoba 1940

Displacement

The High Arctic relocation took place during the Cold War in the 1950s the federal government forcibly relocated 92 Inuit citizens to the High Arctic as human symbols of Canada's assertion of ownership of the region.

The Inuit were told that they would be returned home to Northern Quebec after two years if they wished, but this offer was later withdrawn as it would damage Canada's claims to the High Arctic. They were forced to stay.


In 1993, after extensive hearings, the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples issued The High Arctic Relocation - Report on the 1953–55 Relocation. An official government apology was given on August 18, 2010, to the relocated families for the inhumane treatment and suffering caused by the relocation.



"The Government of Canada deeply regrets the mistakes and broken promises of this dark chapter of our history and apologizes for the High Arctic relocation having taken place. We would like to pay tribute to the relocatees for their perseverance and courage. The relocation of Inuit families to the High Arctic is a tragic chapter in Canada's history that we should not forget, but that we must acknowledge, learn from and teach our children. Acknowledging our shared history allows us to move forward in partnership and in a spirit of reconciliation."

John Duncan
(Minister of Indian Affairs)

The Nunavik Dog Slaughter

The Nunavik dog slaughter was a practice that occurred between the 1950s and late 1960s where Royal Canadian Mounted Police from Ontario and Quebec were given orders to slaughter sled dogs from Indigenous Nunavik communities.

  • The Culling:
    Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) officers, Quebec provincial police, and other authorities shot over 1,000 sled dogs.

  • The Impact:
    Sled dogs were essential for the Inuit to travel across the land, hunt seals and caribou, and survive. Killing the dogs forced nomadic Inuit into permanent settlements, stripped away their independence, and caused deep economic and food insecurity.

  • Intent:
    While authorities often claimed the actions fell under animal control or public safety, Inuit leaders noted the slaughters served to forcefully settle nomadic communities, creating lasting intergenerational trauma.

  • Provincial Apology:
    The Government of Quebec formally apologized for the dog slaughters in 2011.

  • Federal Apology:
    In November 2024, the federal government delivered a historic apology in Kangiqsujuaq, Nunavik, acknowledging Canada's role in the historic injustice.

  • Reconciliation Funds:
    The federal apology included $45 million in compensation directed to Makivvik to support community healing, cultural revitalization, and programs promoting the return of dog teams.

Sled Dogs

Medical Segregation

Medical segregation of Indigenous peoples in Canada involved the operation of 33 federally funded, racially segregated "Indian hospitals" between 1936 and 1981.

  • Purpose:
    The Indian hospitals were racially segregated hospitals originally used to isolate Indigenous tuberculosis patients from the general population because of a fear among health officials that "Indian TB" posed a danger to the non-indigenous population.

  • Experimental Surgeries:
    From 1949 to 1953, 374 experimental surgeries were performed on TB patients, without the use of general anesthetic at the Charles Camsell Indian Hospital.

  • Conditions:
    The hospitals were chronically underfunded, understaffed, severely overcrowded, and culturally unsafe. Patients experienced physical and emotional abuse, and non-consensual medical experimentation.

  • Segregation Methods:
    Aside from dedicated facilities, mainstream community hospitals often relegated Indigenous patients to basements or separate "Indian annexes".

  • The System - Then and Now:
    The network created a separate and unequal standard of care and studies show that nearly a quarter of First Nations and Inuit people continue to experience unfair treatment or racism from healthcare professionals.

  • Reconciliation:
    On 25 January 2018, former patients of Indian hospitals filed a class-action lawsuit against the federal government. In 2025, a settlement agreement was reached offering individual compensation to survivors of Indian hospitals who suffered abuse. The official claims process opened on January 27, 2026.

Fort Qu’Appelle, Saskatchewan Indian Hospital

The Fort Qu’Appelle Indian Hospital, Saskatchewan, built in 1936, the 50-bed Fort Qu’Appelle Indian Hospital sat across Echo Lake from Saskatchewan’s provincial sanatorium. It was the site of Dr. RG Ferguson’s experimental BCG vaccine trial on Indigenous infants in the 1930s and 1940s. The hospital closed in 2004.

Birth Alerts

Birth alerts, disproportionately used for Indigenous children, was a practice in Canada, in which a social or health care worker notifies the staff of a hospital if they have concerns for the safety of an expected child based on their parents' history. This can include past instances of poverty, domestic violence, drug usage, and history with child welfare.

A birth alert could also be issued if the mother had undergone frequent moves, or had been in the foster care system herself as a child. Birth alerts are typically issued without the parents' consent, and often result in apprehension and placement of the child into foster care after birth.

In June 2019 after a report determined that the practice of targeting and apprehending infants from Indigenous mothers was "racist and discriminatory" the practice of Birth Alerts was abolished. The last province to abolish this practice was Quebec in 2023.

The “Sixties Scoop”

Beginning in the 1950s and 1960s, child welfare authorities systematically removed tens of thousands of Indigenous infants and children from their families and homes often without their parents’ or band’s consent.


Most children were placed with non-Indigenous, white families, to sever their cultural ties.

The physical and emotional separation from their birth families continues to affect adult adoptees and Indigenous communities to this day.


Sterilization

The practice of forcibly sterilizing individuals deemed mentally unfit or "socially inadequate" was widespread in the early to mid-20th century. The belief was that by preventing these individuals from reproducing, society would be protected from the perceived negative impact of their genes. This led to compulsory sterilization of thousands of people, many of whom were Indigenous women, individuals with disabilities, and those deemed to have "undesirable" traits.

The legal basis for compulsory sterilization in Canada can be traced back to the passage of the Sexual Sterilization Act in Alberta in 1928. This legislation allowed for the sterilization of individuals deemed mentally deficient or mentally ill without their consent.

These practices remained in place until the 1970s, when public opinion began to shift and the practice was eventually deemed unethical and inhumane.

No comments:

Post a Comment